Dress Code > Featured > News and trends > Surveys
Provocative = Productive, New Survey Says
- July 7th, 2010
- 32 Comments
Need a confidence boost at work? A new study suggests that — if you’re a woman — a low-cut top and sky-high stilettos may help your cause. According to a survey conducted by UK recruitment website HireScores.com, many women feel that they perform better at work when they dress “sexy.”
The study, which polled close to 1,300 British professionals, found that 78 percent of respondents felt that the way they dressed was the most important factor in enhancing their work performance. Of the women who agreed that the way they dressed made them better workers, 53 percent responded that “dressing provocatively helped their productivity.”
Lisette Howlett, managing director of HireScores.com, tried to explain the correlation between provocative attire and improved work performance in a company press release. “I was curious as to why women feel productive when they dress more provocatively and having checked this out concluded that this is because it gives them a sense of empowerment which in turn makes them more confident in the office. Indeed feeling confident and positive seem to be two key factors to high work performance, ” Howlett said.
Yet the number of women who feel that dressing provocatively can be equated with productivity seems unexpectedly high, especially given the recent case of Debrahlee Lorenzana — the curvaceous female banker who alleged that she was fired from Citibank for being “too sexy.”
After all, although Lorenzana made a case that the firing was unfair, the fact that her style of dress could be grounds for termination is, in itself, enough to spark a debate about whether dressing sexy at the office is worth the risk of losing your job.
And then there’s the argument that — while Lorenzana’s figure (whether enhanced or not) is decidedly not the concern of her male counterparts — it is still clear that she was viewed as a sex-symbol in her office; a counterproductive stigma for a woman looking to climb the corporate ladder. It seems that, while feeling attractive may provide a short-term confidence boost, in the long-run exuding a sexy image can have a negative impact on one’s career.
“Dressing provocatively will absolutely backfire on women who want to be taken seriously in the workforce,” says Lizandra Vega, author of “The Image of Success: Make a Great Impression and Land the Job You Want.” ”Women may think that it gives them a competitive edge over other ‘less sexy’ women, but dressing in a provocative manner will hinder a woman’s chances of competing for senior level, highly authoritative positions that their male counterparts are also vying to attain. Dressing provocatively is associated with being a bimbo rather than a smart executive who can make intelligent decisions. Women may be able to get away with provocative dressing for jobs that are support level jobs (to men), but it will definitely hinder crossing the line to senior level, executive positions,” she says.
Though provocative dressing may not be the best way to get ahead, that doesn’t mean that women should be relegated to baggy pantsuits and clogs at the office, for fear of being “too sexy.”
Indeed, says Vega, a happy medium can be determined. Below, she helps establish the line between clothes that flatter and clothes that flaunt, with these guidelines for looking pretty, polished and professional in the workplace:
- Keep skirt hemlines right above the knee cap
- Maintain shirt buttons closed just enough where cleavage is not showing
- Wear comfortable pumps with a heel that is between 1/2″-2 3/4″ high.
- Leave strappy sandals, peep toe shoes and slides for weekend wear not office wear.
- Wear hosiery at all times.
- Wear undergarments that adjust and maintain your body parts in their proper place rather than having them jiggle and bounce.
What do you think about provocative clothing and the workplace? Let us know in the comments section, below.
For more information on dressing for the job you want, check out “The Image of Success.”
About Kaitlin Madden
Kaitlin Madden is a writer and blogger for CareerBuilder. She spends her time at work thinking and writing about work, and thus views her workday as one big social experiment. Prior to joining CareerBuilder, she was a freelance writer and spent some time working in fashion in New York City. She hates meetings and honors her love of shoes with a large collection under her desk. Kaitlin hails from Connecticut and graduated from Northeastern University in Boston with a degree in journalism.I have to show my appreciation to this writer just for rescuing me from this dilemma. Right after surfing throughout the search engines and coming across views that were not beneficial, I thought my entire life was well over. Existing minus the solutions to the problems you have resolved as a result of the posting is a serious case, and those that might have in a wrong way damaged my career if I hadn't come across the website. That knowledge and kindness in dealing with every aspect was priceless. I'm not sure what I would've done if I hadn't encountered such a point like this. I can now look forward to my future. Thanks for your time so much for this skilled and result oriented guide. I will not think twice to suggest your web page to any person who will need assistance on this area.
Hi Nadia
you said that me being confused was natural- do you think that the sexy dressed female student in my class was aware that she was turning me on - does she not realize that she is making it difficult for me to teach.
Ross
Beautiful women are not worried about how their looks affect you, so no she does not know or care that her looks are "making it hard for you to teach." She's not at work, she in class, so she is not expected to wear "professional" and conservative clothing. There are plenty of sexy women in America, and you just need to learn how to deal with that.
Helen, I think you are absolutely right about looking polished. It get's the job done and sets the right tone for professional relationships.
Plus, let's be honest, it can be much sexier than something more overt. Subtly is dangerously underrated in our society. Wearing something flattering that is not overly provocative is empowering without inviting the type of confusion that Ross is experiencing.
Of course, I say confusion but I suspect this student is well aware of how attractive she is to him. She may even be enjoying the attention and tension that ensues. It's possible she feels that dressing this way gives her advantages and she's right.
That said, I really don't think there's anything terribly surprising about her behavior. That Ross is confused is natural too. I believe it boils down to ethics. Your neighbor may leave the door ajar but that is still not an invitation to enter, much less make yourself at home.
Certainly, there are some folks who are oblivious to the effect their appearance has on others but I think most will have some understanding of that by the time they leave high school. I believe what is missing is some dialogue about what constitutes appropriate ethical behavior socially as well as professionally.
It is rarely ever appropriate to tease and yet we laugh about it so often. Flirting is commonly used as a social lubricant but at what point does it cross lines? Right now, everyone has to decide that for themselves but developing some level of consensus would be empowering for our society as a whole.
Lastly, the only thing I really take issue with in the above article is the idea that we women must wear hosiery to appear professional. Maybe it adds to the finished polished image but it's also confining, unnatural and often uncomfortable. I would hate to think that after a certain amount of working with colleagues my unhosed legs could undermine my professional persona.
Unless someone is actively oggling me below the waist, at what point would they even notice such a thing? I can see how low cut tops or tighter skirts/pants could be distracting but the same argument is hard to make for a knee or an ankle. Afterall, we left those notions behind about a hundred years ago, didn't we??
I agree with all of the suggestions about appropriate dress for women in the workplace, including hosiery. I am a female attorney, and I hear what the male attorneys -- and judges -- say about the young female attorneys who come into court bare-legged. It's not about the knee or ankle -- it's about a leg that is uncovered up to and beyond the hem of a skirt. Not only is it considered provocative by most men over 40 (and just who do you think is sitting on the bench??), it is also considered unprofessional. Look at the men you are competing against and working with. The only uncovered parts of their bodies are their hands and their faces. Suits are cut to draw the eye up and to the face, not to distract from it with detail, color, etc. I wear many suits, dresses, skirts, and jackets, in many colors. But I am always aware that the men in the room, who always outnumber me, are wearing armour; how many layers of clothing are there between men's bodies and the open air? Think about it.
My attire needs to make me feel confident, look professional, and make the most of my natural assets without overtly drawing attention to them. My best assets are my legs -- I always show them, but in hosiery.
I worked in an industrial inside sales position for 20 years and was pulled aside and warned by the GM to tone down my style of dress for our annual sales rep meeting. Truth was, I dressed no differently than any of the other women except that they weighed 30-200 lbs. more than me. I have worked out hard for my physique and admittedly take pride in it. I, therefore, wear clothes that fit well - not short, not tight, not low cut but fitted. I informed the GM that his comments were discriminating and needed to be made to all
the females in the office, some of whom were all but busting out of their seams. Discrimination can work both ways.
Well I’m teaching a class of adult students and one of the female students who has a beautiful figure and big gorgeous breasts comes into class wearing tight skimpy tops and tight pants which emphasize her breasts and her figure. She often asks me over to her desk with a question. She’s friendly to me and comes up to my desk to ask something . Is she teasing me ?she must know that it really turns me on. Or is she just being friendly -is she deliberately trying to turn me on for fun- I don’t know why she dresses like that in my class. I’ve been very helpful and nice to her with her English studies and this is how she repays me -sexually teasing me-Ladies what do you think?
Ross
Ross,
Women wear what makes them feel pretty and confident, and that has nothing to do with you. If she is flirting, looking at you with 'bedroom eyes,' or trying to chat with you about non-school issues, then maybe you could conclude that she has a crush on you. Did it ever occur to you that she might have a crush on someone in the class and she is dressing to get their attention, not yours?
If all the evidence you have is that she is wearing sexy clothes, then you really need to get over it, and focus on being a professional in a world that happens to have beautiful women in it.
As a female business owner, being taken seriously by the male prospect was always a challenge in my early 30's. In my opinion, provocative dressing only invites unwanted "sexual" gestures from others and diminishes the value of your expertise when selling a product or service. A polished appearance adds credibility and most likely assists in closing a sale that would potentially lead to a long lasting business relationship with respect and integrity. Obviously, you have to deliver what you've sold and deliver it well for repeat business.
Trackbacks
Stay Connected
- No Cussing At Work: What the [Bleep]? (1,189)
- A few things you should know about minimum wage (1,161)
- Is there a reason you’re late … or is it just an excuse? (1,017)
- Co-workers are strange. Very, very strange. (639)
- Do Accents Make Workers Seem Less Credible? (617)
- One person’s scent is another person’s headache (604)
- Don’t Say That To Your Boss; Say This Instead (560)
- The future’s 15 most wanted workers (558)
- Job seekers most common (and unusual) interview mistakes (444)
- Why whiners don’t win at work (443)
- Where to find a job in a stalling market (431)
- Where Will The Jobs Be This Decade? (366)
- 5 jobs that pay you to play on Facebook (359)
- Today’s Most Dangerous Jobs (356)
- Best and worst states for job seekers (352)
- 25 best-paying jobs for women (344)
- Credit checks on the job hunt: The debate continues (341)
- 8 things that can kill your job chances (335)
- Star Wars or Star Trek? Questions you just might hear in the interview (301)
- Five People to Cozy Up to On The Job (293)
- Do you know how to deal with a work spouse?
- Companies hiring this week
- Is “To whom it may concern” the kiss of death?
- Could your cube mate be your soul mate too?
- 22 companies hiring in large volume
- The find-a-job plan for college seniors
- America at age 24: An education and employment snapshot
- Job-market recovery off to a great start in 2012
- The surefire way to ace your job interview, from Bravo’s ‘The Headhuntress’
- 8 things that can kill your job chances
- 3 Facebook Timeline tips for job seekers
- 10 weird excuses workers use when late to work
- The best careers for your zodiac sign
- How to define your personal brand
- 8 of the weirdest work stories from 2011
- Job seekers most common (and unusual) interview mistakes
- 7 tips for improving email etiquette
- 6 ways the job search has changed post-recession
- 50 jobs that pay $50,000
- 8 job-related smartphone apps
- February 2012 (10)
- January 2012 (22)
- December 2011 (20)
- November 2011 (22)
- October 2011 (26)
- September 2011 (27)
- August 2011 (22)
- July 2011 (21)
- June 2011 (22)
- May 2011 (20)
- April 2011 (21)
- March 2011 (25)
- February 2011 (20)
- January 2011 (19)
- December 2010 (20)
- November 2010 (20)
- October 2010 (20)
- September 2010 (19)
- August 2010 (20)
- July 2010 (21)
- June 2010 (18)
- May 2010 (20)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (22)
- February 2010 (15)
- January 2010 (16)
- December 2009 (15)
- November 2009 (12)
- October 2009 (22)
- September 2009 (19)
- August 2009 (34)
- July 2009 (40)
- June 2009 (35)
- May 2009 (18)
- April 2009 (21)
- March 2009 (27)
- February 2009 (16)
- January 2009 (18)
- December 2008 (16)
- November 2008 (32)
- October 2008 (33)
- September 2008 (28)
- August 2008 (15)
- July 2008 (27)
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (6)
- March 2008 (6)
- February 2008 (8)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (8)
- July 2007 (8)
- June 2007 (9)
- May 2007 (6)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (4)
Subscribe
- No Cussing At Work: What the [Bleep]? (1,189)
- A few things you should know about minimum wage (1,161)
- Is there a reason you’re late … or is it just an excuse? (1,017)
- Co-workers are strange. Very, very strange. (639)
- Do Accents Make Workers Seem Less Credible? (617)
- One person’s scent is another person’s headache (604)
- Don’t Say That To Your Boss; Say This Instead (560)
- The future’s 15 most wanted workers (558)
- Job seekers most common (and unusual) interview mistakes (444)
- Why whiners don’t win at work (443)
- Where to find a job in a stalling market (431)
- Where Will The Jobs Be This Decade? (366)
- 5 jobs that pay you to play on Facebook (359)
- Today’s Most Dangerous Jobs (356)
- Best and worst states for job seekers (352)
- 25 best-paying jobs for women (344)
- Credit checks on the job hunt: The debate continues (341)
- 8 things that can kill your job chances (335)
- Star Wars or Star Trek? Questions you just might hear in the interview (301)
- Five People to Cozy Up to On The Job (293)
- Do you know how to deal with a work spouse?
- Companies hiring this week
- Is “To whom it may concern” the kiss of death?
- Could your cube mate be your soul mate too?
- 22 companies hiring in large volume
- The find-a-job plan for college seniors
- America at age 24: An education and employment snapshot
- Job-market recovery off to a great start in 2012
- The surefire way to ace your job interview, from Bravo’s ‘The Headhuntress’
- 8 things that can kill your job chances
- 3 Facebook Timeline tips for job seekers
- 10 weird excuses workers use when late to work
- The best careers for your zodiac sign
- How to define your personal brand
- 8 of the weirdest work stories from 2011
- Job seekers most common (and unusual) interview mistakes
- 7 tips for improving email etiquette
- 6 ways the job search has changed post-recession
- 50 jobs that pay $50,000
- 8 job-related smartphone apps
- February 2012 (10)
- January 2012 (22)
- December 2011 (20)
- November 2011 (22)
- October 2011 (26)
- September 2011 (27)
- August 2011 (22)
- July 2011 (21)
- June 2011 (22)
- May 2011 (20)
- April 2011 (21)
- March 2011 (25)
- February 2011 (20)
- January 2011 (19)
- December 2010 (20)
- November 2010 (20)
- October 2010 (20)
- September 2010 (19)
- August 2010 (20)
- July 2010 (21)
- June 2010 (18)
- May 2010 (20)
- April 2010 (14)
- March 2010 (22)
- February 2010 (15)
- January 2010 (16)
- December 2009 (15)
- November 2009 (12)
- October 2009 (22)
- September 2009 (19)
- August 2009 (34)
- July 2009 (40)
- June 2009 (35)
- May 2009 (18)
- April 2009 (21)
- March 2009 (27)
- February 2009 (16)
- January 2009 (18)
- December 2008 (16)
- November 2008 (32)
- October 2008 (33)
- September 2008 (28)
- August 2008 (15)
- July 2008 (27)
- June 2008 (7)
- May 2008 (2)
- April 2008 (6)
- March 2008 (6)
- February 2008 (8)
- January 2008 (6)
- December 2007 (3)
- November 2007 (3)
- October 2007 (8)
- September 2007 (7)
- August 2007 (8)
- July 2007 (8)
- June 2007 (9)
- May 2007 (6)
- February 2007 (2)
- January 2007 (4)
















Sex lives not affected by World Cup matches…
I found your entry interesting thus I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog
…
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] Not Provocative, Equals Productive, Employers Say 24. July 2010 | work buzz | Permalink A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. [...]
[...] A couple of weeks ago we told you about a survey that found over half of female respondents felt more productive at work when dressed provocatively. Now, according to a different survey, it’s apparent that employers don’t agree. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] comes on the heels of a variety of other recent reports on appearance and the workplace — one which suggested that women who dressed “provocatively,” felt more productive at work. [...]
[...] Provocative = Productive, New Survey Says Need a confidence boost at work? A new study suggests that… [...]
[...] Provocative = Productive, New Survey Says Need a confidence boost at work? A new study suggests that… [...]
[...] Provocative = Productive, New Survey Says Need a confidence boost at work? A new study suggests that… [...]